Two mutilated Mayan Olmec sculptures found in June and August in Guatemala are now believed to have been pieces of a single, enigmatic figure, carved sometime before 200 BC. According an article in the Guatemala Times:
This sculpture presents an imposing character, decorated with insignias of power with certain Olmec characteristics such as the sign U on the sash. Something very surprising is that this character is carrying a small human figure on his back. This small human figure has the position of his arms on his chest and hands folded down, and very straight legs, similar to those infants who are often found in the lap of the Olmec jade figures. These infant figures have been interpreted by some archaeologists as divine beings or ancestors. The quality of the volume and complete form of the sculpture conveys the formal concepts of Olmec art sculpture; however, this sculpture seems strange.
The character is standing on the capital of a column of rectangular sides. The capital was carved in the shape of the head of a monster bat or monster of the earth (Cauac). This form of representation of the monster Cauac with Mayan features is found a few decades later in other classic Maya cities, as in Quirigua and Copan. In Quirigua and Copan the steles have the monster Cauac on the base on which the rulers are standing.
It is important to note that the small figure on the back of the standing character is literally joined by an extended cloth or skirt to the head of the bat. It is evident that the intention of the sculptor of this figure was to communicate the importance of the union of the carrier of the ancestor with the monster of the earth.
Among the questions for which archaeologists are seeking answers:
- Why is the character carrying a small figure on his back?
- Who is the character and who is the little creature?
- Why is this character standing on a bat?
- Why is the sculptural style of the character apparently different from that of the style of the bat?
- What is the message that the sculpture is transmitting? What is the message transmitted by the two texts in early glyphs?
- Why was this sculpture destroyed and its pieces then included in the structure of the wall?
- Where had this sculpture have been standing so it could be seen from all four sides?
Click here for the article in the Guatemala Times.
Drawing indicates how the two pieces fit together to form a single sculpture, carved sometime before 200 BC.